> UPDATING_DATABASE... January 21, 2026

PQC Transition: Still Kicking the Can Down the Quantum Road (2026)

Post-Quantum Cryptography Transition Report (2026)

Post-Quantum Cryptography Transition: Still Kicking the Can Down the Quantum Road

Report by: Yours Truly, Lead Dev, Jaded Inc.

Date: October 26, 2026

Alright, another year, another 'critical' report on the Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) transition. If I had a nickel for every time management asked for an update on something they should've funded properly three years ago, I'd have enough to buy a quantum computer myself. Here we are in late 2026, and surprise, surprise, it's still a glorious mess.

1. Current "Progress" (aka Managed Expectations)

So, NIST finally settled on some first-round algorithms for standardization – big hooray. CRYSTALS-Kyber for key encapsulation and CRYSTALS-Dilithium for signatures are apparently the chosen ones. For now. Don't worry, I'm sure we'll find some fundamental flaw in them by 2028 and start all over. The rest are still in the 'let's poke it with a stick' phase.

The good news? We're all doing "hybrid mode." Which, let's be honest, is just a fancy way of saying we're concatenating an old crypto key with a new one and praying to whatever deity is listening that it's good enough. It's the equivalent of putting a new coat of paint on a rusty old jalopy and calling it 'future-proof'.

Key Algorithm Status (As of My Last Mental Breakdown)

Algorithm Type NIST Status (Roughly) Current Impact on Dev Team
CRYSTALS-Kyber KEM Standardized (FINALLY) Integrating into new services, trying not to break old ones. Performance hits are... noticeable.
CRYSTALS-Dilithium Signature Standardized (Also FINALLY) Used for code signing, identity. Key sizes are making DBAs cry.
SPHINCS+ Signature Alternate/Stateful Nobody's touching this with a 10-foot pole unless absolutely forced. Too much state to manage.
Classic McEliece KEM Considered "Too Big" "Too big for what, exactly? Our bloated microservices?" – Actual quote from a junior dev. Not used much.

2. The Usual Headaches (No Surprises Here)

2.1. Legacy Systems: The Undead Army

Our critical FoobarService v1.2 from 2008, still running on a physical server in the basement and maintained by a guy who retired five years ago, isn't exactly "quantum-ready." Nor is it "patch-ready," "migrate-ready," or "awake-ready." Management keeps saying "we'll get to it," but "it" is usually followed by a new feature request that generates immediate revenue, so you know how that goes.

The number of systems still relying on hardcoded elliptic curve parameters or ancient RSA keys is truly astounding. We're talking about:

  • Old VPN tunnels (site-to-site from 2012).
  • Embedded devices (IoT from before "IoT" was cool, or secure).
  • Archival data encryption (because who cares about data from 2015, right? Just throw it on the quantum dumpster fire).

2.2. The "Lift and Shift" Fantasy

Someone in a suit, who probably thinks YAML is a new type of artisanal yogurt, keeps suggesting we just "lift and shift" our crypto libraries. Yeah, sure. Because crypto isn't deeply embedded in every single protocol, every network stack, every database connection, and every custom authorization layer we've ever built. It's not a library; it's the freaking foundations of our digital existence.

And let's not forget the performance implications. The new PQC algorithms are... chunkier. Key sizes are bigger, operations are slower. Our latency-sensitive applications are already complaining, and we're just getting started.


# Actual code from our "quantum-ready" branch
# (Don't judge, it's 2 AM and I'm fueled by instant coffee)

def hybrid_key_exchange(old_key, new_pqc_key):
    # This is fine. Everything is fine.
    return concatenate_keys(old_key, new_pqc_key)

# Somewhere else...
try:
    pqc_algorithm.generate_keypair()
except ImportError as e:
    log_warning("PQC library not found, falling back to RSA-2048. YOLO.")
    rsa_algorithm.generate_keypair()
finally:
    send_alarm_to_security_team("Just in case...")
        

2.3. Budget & Resources: Always a Priority, Never Funded

"It's critical! But we can't allocate more budget until there's an *actual* quantum attack." This gem is from our CFO. Because waiting for the house to burn down before buying fire insurance is a genius strategy. We're constantly fighting for dev cycles, training, and even just simple tooling. The cost of failing to transition will be astronomical, but that's a future problem, right?

2.4. Supply Chain Chaos

Trying to get vendors to confirm their "quantum-readiness" is like pulling teeth from a shark. Half of them don't understand the question, the other half point to a whitepaper from 2021 saying they're "investigating." We're dependent on so many third-party libraries, services, and hardware components that the thought of tracking it all makes me want to take up a new career as a professional napper.

3. Recommendations (If Anyone Bothered to Listen)

Here's what we *should* be doing, if we weren't perpetually playing catch-up:

  1. Inventory, Inventory, Inventory: Re-audit every single system that touches cryptography. I know we did this last year, but things change, and people deploy stuff without telling anyone. Again.
  2. Prioritize Risk: Focus on high-value, high-risk assets first. Data with long-term confidentiality requirements, authentication services, and anything external-facing.
  3. Push Vendors (Harder): Demand clear roadmaps and evidence of PQC adoption from all third-party dependencies. If they can't provide it, start looking for alternatives.
  4. Train Your People: No, watching a 30-minute webinar on "What is a Qubit?" isn't enough. Fund proper training for developers and security engineers.
  5. Prepare for the Inevitable: Assume whatever algorithms we've chosen *today* might be broken *tomorrow*. Build modular crypto layers that can be swapped out relatively easily. (Yes, I know, "easy" in crypto usually means "herculean task").

4. Conclusion: See You Next Year, Same Time, Same Problem

The PQC transition isn't a sprint; it's an endless marathon where the finish line keeps moving. We've made *some* progress, but the sheer inertia of legacy systems, combined with a persistent lack of foresight and adequate funding, means we'll be having this same conversation well into the next decade. Just try not to break anything too badly in the meantime.

Now if you'll excuse me, I hear the coffee machine calling my name. Or maybe it's just the sound of my soul slowly dying.